The world changed from 2008 onwards. “No take-backs”? Or is there a solution to “heal the land“?
Between pre-2008 and 2014, and current day, several significant events and statistically measurable moral trends from 24% to 60-70% in the United States, contributed to changes in the emotional security of teenagers — and adults.
Mass Shootings and Gun Violence
One of the most impactful events was the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting on December 14, 2012. This tragic event, in which 20 children and six educators were killed, was described as a “tipping point” in the national conversation about gun violence. The psychological impact of this event was profound, affecting not only the immediate community but also resonating nationwide. The pervasive media coverage and the emotional identification with the victims amplified the trauma experienced by the broader public. This period also saw other high-profile mass shootings, such as the Aurora, Colorado theater shooting in 2012, which further contributed to a climate of fear and insecurity.
Media and Social Media Influence
The rise of social media during this period also played a significant role in shaping emotional security. Social media platforms became central to the dissemination of news and personal stories, often amplifying the emotional impact of tragic events. The constant exposure to such events through media could heighten stress and anxiety among both teenagers and adults. The proliferation of information contributed to a sense of instability and insecurity.
Economic and Political Factors
The aftermath of the 2008 massive financial crisis continued to affect the emotional well-being of many Americans during this period. Economic uncertainty, job losses, and the slow recovery contributed to feelings of insecurity and stress. Additionally, the political climate, marked by significant polarization and contentious elections, further exacerbated emotional tensions. The post-2012 presidential election climate of divisive commentary by elected officials and candidates in the decade since, highlight the deep political divides — influencing emotional responses.
– – – – –
James Marshall
Interesting, however, I disagree that 2012 Political Campaign was as divisive and “depressing” as the other 2 events; Obama and Mitt Romney were both articulate, civil to each other, and respectful of our national institutions and laws and norms. Perhaps 2012 was the last and the beginning of the end. For sure 2016 was the true Political Campaign that introduced hate and diviseness and added to national depression and pessimism…
– – – – –
Michael H Peters
Hi James, I agree, of course, about the election itself in 2012. My observation at the time was that an opportunity was wasted in the administration following that election — to be peacemakers rather than to choose sides. It was an opportunity for the generations, but the political pressures were too much 2012-2016 to be fair arbiters instead of choosing sides. Trying to compensate for centuries of injustice all in one term… backfired. Compensation. The “architects“ in DC from both “sides” pretty much all arrived at that conclusion. The results speak for themselves on the chart, obviously in combination with other factors listed, and probably more, such as pharmaceuticals.
– – – – –
James Marshall
Agree. Thank you.
